Extreme Networks vs Omnicell
EXTR and OMCL side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXTR and OMCL compare
Extreme Networks is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Omnicell ($3.5B against $1.6B).
On earnings, Omnicell is cheaper: it trades at 36.1× trailing earnings, against 68.6× for Extreme Networks.
Extreme Networks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.3% versus 5.6% for Omnicell).
Extreme Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.0% compared with 3.6% at Omnicell.
Omnicell scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for Extreme Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXTR | OMCL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5B | $1.6B |
| Share price | $26.75 | $35.03 |
| Change, 1 year | 46.4% | −5.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 98.9% | −80.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.33 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 2,894 | 3,580 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 68.6× | 36.1× (better) |
| P/S | 2.7× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | 39.9× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 46.5× | 9.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.7× | 11.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.4% | 9.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $14.29 | $54.87 |
| Margin of safety | −87.2% | 36.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.3% (better) | 5.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 5.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 507% (better) | 124% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 457% (better) | 126% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 73.0% (better) | −44.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.9% (better) | 45.1% |
| Operating margin | 5.7% (better) | 5.2% |
| Net margin | 4.0% (better) | 3.6% |
| FCF margin | 11.8% (better) | 11.7% |
| Return on equity | 67.1% (better) | 3.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 124% (better) | 4.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.27 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.60 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.02 | 1.66 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.99 | 2.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.4% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 4.1% | 3.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.2M | −$2.9M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 8.6% |
Go deeper
- EXTR stock overview
- EXTR income statement
- EXTR valuation and score
- OMCL stock overview
- OMCL income statement
- OMCL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.