Extreme Networks vs Immersion
EXTR and IMMR side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXTR and IMMR compare
Extreme Networks is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as Immersion ($3.5B against $230M).
On earnings, Immersion is cheaper: it trades at 21.0× trailing earnings, against 68.6× for Extreme Networks.
Extreme Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.0% compared with 0.60% at Immersion.
Immersion pays a dividend yielding 4.3%; Extreme Networks does not pay one.
Immersion scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Extreme Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXTR | IMMR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5B | $230M |
| Share price | $26.75 | $6.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 46.4% | 3.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 98.9% | 12.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 2,894 | 20 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 68.6× | 21.0× (better) |
| P/S | 2.7× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 39.9× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 46.5× | 3.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.7× | 3.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.4% | 26.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $14.29 | $26.35 |
| Margin of safety | −87.2% | 73.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.3% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 117% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 507% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 457% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 73.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.9% | – |
| Operating margin | 5.7% (better) | 1.9% |
| Net margin | 4.0% (better) | 0.60% |
| FCF margin | 11.8% (better) | 3.5% |
| Return on equity | 67.1% (better) | 3.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 124% (better) | 14.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.27 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.60 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.9× (better) | 2.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.02 | 2.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.99 | 2.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 102% |
| Buyback yield | 2.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% | 4.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.4% | 58.0% |
| Held by insiders | 4.1% | 19.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.2M | $261K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 11.2% |
Go deeper
- EXTR stock overview
- EXTR income statement
- EXTR valuation and score
- IMMR stock overview
- IMMR income statement
- IMMR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.