Expedia vs GXO Logistics
EXPE and GXO side by side, both in transportation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXPE and GXO compare
Expedia is the larger company, worth 6.0 times as much as GXO Logistics ($34.3B against $5.8B).
On earnings, Expedia is cheaper: it trades at 17.8× trailing earnings, against 44.5× for GXO Logistics.
Expedia grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.0% versus 7.6% for GXO Logistics).
Expedia keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.0% compared with 0.96% at GXO Logistics.
Expedia pays a dividend yielding 0.64%; GXO Logistics does not pay one.
Expedia scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 5 for GXO Logistics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXPE | GXO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $34.3B | $5.8B |
| Share price | $285.93 | $50.27 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.1% | −6.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 57.0% | −46.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.42 | 1.42 |
| Employees | 16K | 154K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.8× (better) | 44.5× |
| P/S | 2.2× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 28.4× | 1.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6× (better) | 10.3× |
| P/FCF | 7.7× (better) | 32.0× |
| PEG | 0.27 | – |
| FCF yield | 13.0% (better) | 3.1% |
| Fair value | $316.85 | $48.39 |
| Margin of safety | 9.8% (better) | −3.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.0% (better) | 7.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.2% (better) | 16.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 82.9% | 108% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 96.6% | 113% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 90.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 16.0% (better) | 2.4% |
| Net margin | 13.0% (better) | 0.96% |
| FCF margin | 28.4% (better) | 1.3% |
| Return on equity | 199% (better) | 4.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 3.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 4.52 | 1.07 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.49 | 3.05 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 7.1× (better) | 2.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.80 (better) | 0.79 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.55 | 1.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | – |
| Payout ratio | 10.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 36.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.6% (better) | 0.31% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.2% (better) | 0.31% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 9.1% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.5M | $304K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.3% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- EXPE stock overview
- EXPE income statement
- EXPE valuation and score
- GXO stock overview
- GXO income statement
- GXO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.