Expeditors International of Washington vs Radiant Logistics
EXPD and RLGT side by side, both in transportation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXPD and RLGT compare
Expeditors International of Washington is the larger company, worth 61 times as much as Radiant Logistics ($25.8B against $426M).
On earnings, Radiant Logistics is cheaper: it trades at 23.3× trailing earnings, against 28.9× for Expeditors International of Washington.
Expeditors International of Washington grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.8% versus 3.5% for Radiant Logistics).
Expeditors International of Washington keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with 2.0% at Radiant Logistics.
Expeditors International of Washington pays a dividend yielding 0.79%; Radiant Logistics does not pay one.
Expeditors International of Washington scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 12 for Radiant Logistics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXPD | RLGT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $25.8B | $426M |
| Share price | $198.85 | $9.08 |
| Change, 1 year | 69.1% | 51.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 58.9% | 25.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 20K | 1,107 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.9× | 23.3× (better) |
| P/S | 2.1× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 12.2× | 1.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.0× | 13.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 28.0× (better) | 32.3× |
| FCF yield | 3.6% (better) | 3.1% |
| Fair value | $126.10 | $7.87 |
| Margin of safety | −57.7% | −15.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.8% (better) | 3.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.9% (better) | 0.76% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7.7% | 8.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.3% (better) | 11.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.9% (better) | −2.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 9.8% (better) | 2.6% |
| Net margin | 7.6% (better) | 2.0% |
| FCF margin | 7.7% (better) | 1.4% |
| Return on equity | 42.6% (better) | 8.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 83.7% (better) | 8.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.10 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.02 |
| Interest coverage | – | 10.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.57 | 1.60 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 9.22 (better) | 4.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.79% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.5% (better) | 0.82% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% (better) | 0.82% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.6% | 55.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.73% | 17.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.3M | −$829K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- EXPD stock overview
- EXPD income statement
- EXPD valuation and score
- RLGT stock overview
- RLGT income statement
- RLGT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.