Expeditors International of Washington vs Forward Air
EXPD and FWRD side by side, both in transportation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXPD and FWRD compare
Expeditors International of Washington is the larger company, worth 43 times as much as Forward Air ($25.8B against $595M).
Expeditors International of Washington grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.8% versus −0.11% for Forward Air).
Expeditors International of Washington keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with −11.4% at Forward Air.
Expeditors International of Washington pays a dividend yielding 0.79%; Forward Air does not pay one.
Expeditors International of Washington scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 3 for Forward Air), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXPD | FWRD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $25.8B | $595M |
| Share price | $198.85 | $17.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 69.1% | −8.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 58.9% | −83.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 1.37 |
| Employees | 20K | 6,062 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.9× | – |
| P/S | 2.1× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 12.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 28.0× | 12.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.6% | 8.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $126.10 | – |
| Margin of safety | −57.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.8% (better) | −0.11% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | 14.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.3% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 9.8% (better) | −6.7% |
| Net margin | 7.6% (better) | −11.4% |
| FCF margin | 7.7% (better) | 1.9% |
| Return on equity | 42.6% (better) | −1574% |
| Return on invested capital | 83.7% (better) | −8.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −1.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.57 (better) | 1.32 |
| Altman Z-score | 9.22 (better) | 0.62 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.79% (better) | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.6% | 90.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.73% | 14.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.3M (better) | −$5.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- EXPD stock overview
- EXPD income statement
- EXPD valuation and score
- FWRD stock overview
- FWRD income statement
- FWRD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.