StockData

Edwards Lifesciences vs Smith & Nephew

EW and SNN side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How EW and SNN compare

Edwards Lifesciences grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.6% versus 6.1% for Smith & Nephew).

Edwards Lifesciences scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Smith & Nephew), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEWSNN
Size and price
Market cap$53.0B–
Share price$92.01$29.70
Change, 1 year11.3%−17.0%
Change, 5 years−22.5%−20.1%
Beta (5Y)1.000.63
Employees16K18K
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)6
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E52.9×–
P/S8.1×–
P/B5.0×–
EV/EBITDA30.7×–
P/FCF37.0×–
FCF yield2.7%–
Fair value$65.85–
Margin of safety−39.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)14.6% (better)6.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.7% (better)6.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−75.8%–
EPS growth (TTM)−75.0%52.3% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average7.1% (better)6.9%
Profitability
Gross margin77.8% (better)68.0%
Operating margin22.3% (better)12.9%
Net margin15.4%–
FCF margin22.0%–
Return on equity9.5%–
Return on invested capital14.3% (better)13.0%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.06 (better)0.10
Net debt / EBITDA−2.26−0.31
Interest coverage–5.7×
Current ratio4.52 (better)2.14
Altman Z-score12.90–
Piotroski F-score5–
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield2.3%–
Shareholder yield2.3%–
Ownership
Held by institutions91.0%4.2%
Held by insiders0.22%25.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$27.7M–
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float1.7%–

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.