EverCommerce vs N-able
EVCM and NABL side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EVCM and NABL compare
EverCommerce is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as N-able ($1.2B against $905M).
N-able grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.3% versus 3.5% for EverCommerce).
EverCommerce keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.8% compared with −2.3% at N-able.
EverCommerce scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for N-able), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EVCM | NABL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $905M |
| Share price | $6.88 | $4.79 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.2% | −38.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −62.7% | −59.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 0.75 |
| Employees | 1,800 | 1,852 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 45.9× | – |
| P/S | 2.0× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.4× | 12.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.5× (better) | 12.0× |
| FCF yield | 8.7% (better) | 8.4% |
| Fair value | $7.98 | $9.45 |
| Margin of safety | 13.8% | 49.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.5% | 8.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.8% (better) | 10.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 78.3% (better) | 75.9% |
| Operating margin | 9.3% | 10.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.8% (better) | −2.3% |
| FCF margin | 17.5% (better) | 14.1% |
| Return on equity | 4.0% (better) | −1.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.5% (better) | 2.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.73 | 0.51 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.20 | 3.01 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.13 (better) | 1.11 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.17 | 1.51 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 5.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.3% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 10.0% | 62.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$16.1M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.2% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- EVCM stock overview
- EVCM income statement
- EVCM valuation and score
- NABL stock overview
- NABL income statement
- NABL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.