Elite Express vs Haoxin
ETS and HXHX side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ETS and HXHX compare
Haoxin keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with −169% at Elite Express.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ETS | HXHX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $71.1M | – |
| Share price | $1.46 | $0.146 |
| Change, 1 year | 157% | −74.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.39 | 2.22 |
| Employees | 26 | 40 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | – | 8 |
| Valuation score | – | 0 |
| Growth score | – | 1 |
| Performance score | – | 4 |
| Health score | – | 3 |
| Dividend score | – | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 23.6× | – |
| P/B | 4.0× | – |
| FCF yield | −9.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 29.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 25.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 15.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.0% | 25.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −197% | 23.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −169% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −231% | −42.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −31.2% | 17.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −58.1% | 19.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.28 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.79 |
| Interest coverage | – | 28.9× |
| Current ratio | 43.97 (better) | 2.37 |
| Altman Z-score | 110.54 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.18% | – |
| Held by insiders | 8.6% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.43% | 0.47% |
Go deeper
- ETS stock overview
- ETS income statement
- ETS valuation and score
- HXHX stock overview
- HXHX income statement
- HXHX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.