Ethan Allen Interiors vs Virco Mfg
ETD and VIRC side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ETD and VIRC compare
Ethan Allen Interiors is the larger company, worth 4.6 times as much as Virco Mfg ($463M against $101M).
Ethan Allen Interiors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−7.4% versus −19.0% for Virco Mfg).
Both pay dividends: Ethan Allen Interiors yields 9.9% and Virco Mfg 1.6%.
Ethan Allen Interiors scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Virco Mfg), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ETD | VIRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $463M | $101M |
| Share price | $18.36 | $6.41 |
| Change, 1 year | −21.7% | −9.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −23.7% | 89.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.78 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 2,137 | 731 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.2× (better) | 77.3× |
| P/FCF | 20.3× | 11.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.9% | 8.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $20.06 | $9.30 |
| Margin of safety | 8.5% | 31.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.4% (better) | −19.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.3% | 5.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −118% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −117% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.8% (better) | 37.5% |
| Operating margin | 6.5% (better) | −2.5% |
| Net margin | – | −1.3% |
| FCF margin | 4.1% | 4.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −2.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.6% (better) | −3.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.03 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −4.42 |
| Interest coverage | – | −15.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.79 | 2.53 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.94 (better) | 2.10 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 9.9% (better) | 1.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.19% |
| Shareholder yield | 9.9% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.0% | 33.9% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 11.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | $320K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | 1.6% |
Go deeper
- ETD stock overview
- ETD income statement
- ETD valuation and score
- VIRC stock overview
- VIRC income statement
- VIRC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.