Ethan Allen Interiors vs MasterBrand
ETD and MBC side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ETD and MBC compare
MasterBrand is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Ethan Allen Interiors ($1.3B against $441M).
MasterBrand grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.9% versus −7.4% for Ethan Allen Interiors).
Ethan Allen Interiors pays a dividend yielding 8.1%; MasterBrand does not pay one.
Ethan Allen Interiors scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for MasterBrand), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ETD | MBC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $441M | $1.3B |
| Share price | $17.50 | $6.37 |
| Change, 1 year | −23.3% | −39.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −27.3% | −39.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 1.26 |
| Employees | 2,137 | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 19.3× | 13.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.2% | 7.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $19.80 | $10.26 |
| Margin of safety | 11.6% | 37.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.4% | 12.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −250% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −238% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.8% (better) | 25.2% |
| Operating margin | 6.5% (better) | −2.0% |
| Net margin | – | −4.0% |
| FCF margin | 4.1% (better) | 3.1% |
| Return on equity | – | −7.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.6% (better) | −1.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.63 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.79 (better) | 1.51 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.89 (better) | 1.50 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.0% | 109% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | −$157K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | 11.4% |
Go deeper
- ETD stock overview
- ETD income statement
- ETD valuation and score
- MBC stock overview
- MBC income statement
- MBC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.