Ethan Allen Interiors vs La-Z-Boy
ETD and LZB side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ETD and LZB compare
La-Z-Boy is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Ethan Allen Interiors ($1.3B against $441M).
La-Z-Boy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.20% versus −7.4% for Ethan Allen Interiors).
Both pay dividends: Ethan Allen Interiors yields 8.1% and La-Z-Boy 3.0%.
La-Z-Boy scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for Ethan Allen Interiors), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ETD | LZB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $441M | $1.3B |
| Share price | $17.50 | $32.61 |
| Change, 1 year | −23.3% | 4.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −27.3% | −9.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 2,137 | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 16.5× |
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× (better) | 6.8× |
| P/FCF | 19.3× | 12.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.2% | 7.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $19.80 | $32.89 |
| Margin of safety | 11.6% (better) | 0.84% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.4% | 0.20% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.3% | 4.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −11.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −9.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.0% | 1.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.8% (better) | 44.4% |
| Operating margin | 6.5% (better) | 5.0% |
| Net margin | – | 3.9% |
| FCF margin | 4.1% | 4.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 8.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.6% | 10.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 169× |
| Current ratio | 1.79 (better) | 1.66 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.89 (better) | 2.62 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.1% (better) | 3.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 47.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 16.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.1% (better) | 7.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.0% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M (better) | −$3.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- ETD stock overview
- ETD income statement
- ETD valuation and score
- LZB stock overview
- LZB income statement
- LZB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.