Ethan Allen Interiors vs Hooker Furnishings
ETD and HOFT side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ETD and HOFT compare
Ethan Allen Interiors is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Hooker Furnishings ($446M against $156M).
Ethan Allen Interiors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−7.4% versus −32.8% for Hooker Furnishings).
Both pay dividends: Ethan Allen Interiors yields 8.0% and Hooker Furnishings 3.2%.
Ethan Allen Interiors scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for Hooker Furnishings), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ETD | HOFT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $446M | $156M |
| Share price | $17.71 | $14.56 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.7% | 47.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.4% | −44.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 2,137 | 840 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 19.6× | 8.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.1% | 12.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $19.94 | $15.03 |
| Margin of safety | 11.2% (better) | 3.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.4% (better) | −32.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.3% (better) | −12.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.8% (better) | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | 6.5% (better) | −6.0% |
| Net margin | – | −8.7% |
| FCF margin | 4.1% | 9.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −9.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.6% (better) | −5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.79 | 3.03 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.91 (better) | 3.48 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.0% (better) | 3.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.0% (better) | 3.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.0% | 73.3% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 9.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | 1.0% |
Go deeper
- ETD stock overview
- ETD income statement
- ETD valuation and score
- HOFT stock overview
- HOFT income statement
- HOFT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.