Ethan Allen Interiors vs Flexsteel Industries
ETD and FLXS side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ETD and FLXS compare
Ethan Allen Interiors is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Flexsteel Industries ($441M against $311M).
Flexsteel Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.4% versus −7.4% for Ethan Allen Interiors).
Both pay dividends: Ethan Allen Interiors yields 8.1% and Flexsteel Industries 1.2%.
Flexsteel Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 13 for Ethan Allen Interiors), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ETD | FLXS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $441M | $311M |
| Share price | $17.50 | $74.83 |
| Change, 1 year | −23.3% | 113% |
| Change, 5 years | −27.3% | 158% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 2,137 | 1,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.2× |
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× (better) | 7.6× |
| P/FCF | 19.3× | 7.3× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.40 |
| FCF yield | 5.2% | 13.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $19.80 | $86.37 |
| Margin of safety | 11.6% | 13.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.4% | 3.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.3% | −0.84% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 33.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 49.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.0% | 14.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.8% (better) | 24.3% |
| Operating margin | 6.5% | 8.7% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 6.7% |
| FCF margin | 4.1% | 9.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 20.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.6% | 23.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.79 | 2.18 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.89 | 5.84 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.1% (better) | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 14.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.1% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.0% | 67.4% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 13.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M (better) | −$3.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | 6.9% |
Go deeper
- ETD stock overview
- ETD income statement
- ETD valuation and score
- FLXS stock overview
- FLXS income statement
- FLXS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.