ESCO Technologies vs Methode Electronics
ESE and MEI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ESE and MEI compare
ESCO Technologies is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as Methode Electronics ($6.0B against $422M).
ESCO Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.0% versus 1.4% for Methode Electronics).
ESCO Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.4% compared with −3.5% at Methode Electronics.
Both pay dividends: ESCO Technologies yields 0.14% and Methode Electronics 1.7%.
ESCO Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 8 for Methode Electronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ESE | MEI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.0B | $422M |
| Share price | $231.50 | $11.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.2% | 71.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 146% | −75.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.87 | 1.49 |
| Employees | 3,425 | 6,650 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 4 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.1× | – |
| P/S | 4.6× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 3.7× | 0.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.0× |
| P/FCF | 28.9× | – |
| PEG | 0.35 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.5% (better) | −3.2% |
| Fair value | $292.64 | $25.18 |
| Margin of safety | 20.9% | 53.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.0% (better) | 1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% (better) | −1.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 174% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 173% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 24.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.0% (better) | 19.8% |
| Operating margin | – | 0.36% |
| Net margin | 24.4% (better) | −3.5% |
| FCF margin | 16.1% (better) | −1.3% |
| Return on equity | 21.4% (better) | −5.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 0.34% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.05 (better) | 0.47 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.14 |
| Current ratio | 1.38 | 2.41 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.97 (better) | 2.10 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 1.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 2.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% (better) | −12.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.14% | 1.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 95.2% |
| Held by insiders | 39.9% | 2.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 8.9% |
Go deeper
- ESE stock overview
- ESE income statement
- ESE valuation and score
- MEI stock overview
- MEI income statement
- MEI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.