ESAB vs Symbotic
ESAB and SYM side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ESAB and SYM compare
Symbotic is the larger company, worth 5.3 times as much as ESAB ($22.9B against $4.3B).
On earnings, ESAB is cheaper: it trades at 23.3× trailing earnings, against 759× for Symbotic.
Symbotic grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.6% versus 9.7% for ESAB).
ESAB keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with 0.31% at Symbotic.
ESAB pays a dividend yielding 0.63%; Symbotic does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ESAB | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.3B | $22.9B |
| Share price | $69.76 | $37.93 |
| Change, 1 year | −39.0% | −51.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 277% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 1.03 |
| Employees | 10K | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 10 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.3× (better) | 759× |
| P/S | 1.4× (better) | 8.7× |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 32.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.2× (better) | 559× |
| P/FCF | 22.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | – |
| Fair value | $81.10 | $6.12 |
| Margin of safety | 14.0% (better) | −520% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.7% | 20.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% | 89.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −32.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −33.3% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.0% (better) | 21.3% |
| Operating margin | 12.1% (better) | −0.01% |
| Net margin | 5.7% (better) | 0.31% |
| FCF margin | 6.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 7.5% (better) | 1.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 7.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.94 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.72 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.96 (better) | 1.33 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.62 | 6.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.63% | – |
| Payout ratio | 14.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | −1.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.63% (better) | −1.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 19.2% |
| Held by insiders | 7.7% | 85.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.9M (better) | −$963M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.0% | 20.6% |
Go deeper
- ESAB stock overview
- ESAB income statement
- ESAB valuation and score
- SYM stock overview
- SYM income statement
- SYM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.