Ero Copper vs Sigma Lithium
ERO and SGML side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ERO and SGML compare
Ero Copper scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 0 for Sigma Lithium), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ERO | SGML |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $29.06 | $5.15 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.6% | −11.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 59.7% | −45.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 1.63 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 67.1% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 35.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.9% | – |
| Operating margin | 34.4% | – |
| Net margin | 33.6% | – |
| FCF margin | 16.8% | – |
| Return on equity | 34.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 16.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.65 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.30 | – |
| Interest coverage | 8.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.06 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 67.3% | 33.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | – |
Go deeper
- ERO stock overview
- ERO income statement
- ERO valuation and score
- SGML stock overview
- SGML income statement
- SGML valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.