StockData

Ero Copper vs MP Materials Corp. / DE

ERO and MP side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ERO and MP compare

MP Materials Corp. / DE grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (71.6% versus 67.1% for Ero Copper).

Ero Copper keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.6% compared with −9.9% at MP Materials Corp. / DE.

Ero Copper scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for MP Materials Corp. / DE), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEROMP
Size and price
Market cap–$6.5B
Share price$30.92$36.73
Change, 1 year39.8%−42.8%
Change, 5 years69.9%−14.0%
Beta (5Y)1.381.36
Employees–998
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score4 (better)2
Performance score6 (better)1
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–16.4×
P/B–3.4×
EV/EBITDA–132×
FCF yield–−8.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)67.1%71.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average19.4% (better)10.8%
EPS growth, 5Y average35.2%–
Profitability
Gross margin43.9% (better)30.6%
Operating margin34.4% (better)−20.5%
Net margin33.6% (better)−9.9%
FCF margin16.8% (better)−134%
Return on equity34.6% (better)−2.0%
Return on invested capital16.9% (better)−5.0%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.650.48 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA1.30 (better)−8.66
Interest coverage8.1× (better)−2.1×
Current ratio1.066.75 (better)
Altman Z-score–3.31
Piotroski F-score8 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions67.3%82.7%
Held by insiders0.00%8.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$128M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float6.3%22.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.