StockData

Ero Copper vs Hudbay Minerals

ERO and HBM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ERO and HBM compare

Ero Copper grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (67.1% versus 9.4% for Hudbay Minerals).

Ero Copper keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.6% compared with 25.7% at Hudbay Minerals.

Ero Copper scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 10 for Hudbay Minerals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEROHBM
Size and price
Share price$29.05$21.70
Change, 1 year35.5%33.7%
Change, 5 years59.9%219%
Beta (5Y)1.371.43
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)10
Valuation score00
Growth score4 (better)3
Performance score6 (better)4
Health score4 (better)3
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)67.1% (better)9.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average19.4% (better)15.1%
Net income growth (TTM)–641%
EPS growth (TTM)–620%
EPS growth, 5Y average35.2%–
Profitability
Gross margin43.9% (better)33.6%
Operating margin34.4%41.5% (better)
Net margin33.6% (better)25.7%
FCF margin16.8% (better)10.9%
Return on equity34.6% (better)19.7%
Return on invested capital16.9% (better)16.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.650.31 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA1.300.32 (better)
Interest coverage8.1×15.1× (better)
Current ratio1.06 (better)0.95
Piotroski F-score8 (better)7
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–0.99%
Ownership
Held by institutions67.3%83.1%
Held by insiders0.00%0.00%
Short interest, % of float6.0%2.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.