Ericsson LM Telephone vs Qualcomm
ERIC and QCOM side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ERIC and QCOM compare
Qualcomm grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.9% versus −4.5% for Ericsson LM Telephone).
Qualcomm keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.0% compared with 12.0% at Ericsson LM Telephone.
Qualcomm pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Ericsson LM Telephone does not pay one.
Ericsson LM Telephone scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for Qualcomm), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ERIC | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $173B |
| Share price | $11.18 | $164.79 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.7% | −7.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 2.1% | 1.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 1.52 |
| Employees | 111K | 52K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.1× |
| P/S | – | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 14.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 16.6× |
| FCF yield | – | 6.0% |
| Fair value | – | $192.49 |
| Margin of safety | – | 14.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.5% | 1.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.37% | 13.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 142040% (better) | −20.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 85000% (better) | −16.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.1% (better) | 2.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.6% | 54.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 16.3% | 23.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 12.0% | 21.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 12.8% | 23.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 27.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 31.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.30 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.24 | −0.49 |
| Interest coverage | 12.7× | 14.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.29 | 2.02 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 5.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | 33.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 6.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 5.3% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 7.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 9.4% | 80.2% |
| Held by insiders | 5.7% | 0.08% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$20.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- ERIC stock overview
- ERIC income statement
- ERIC valuation and score
- QCOM stock overview
- QCOM income statement
- QCOM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.