Equinox Gold vs Wheaton Precious Metals
EQX and WPM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQX and WPM compare
Equinox Gold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (99.1% versus 80.2% for Wheaton Precious Metals).
Wheaton Precious Metals scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Equinox Gold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQX | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $9.70 | $116.58 |
| Change, 1 year | −11.1% | 22.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 24.8% | 184% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.14 | 0.74 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 99.1% (better) | 80.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.5% (better) | 16.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −53.3% | 178% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.5% (better) | 23.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.4% | 72.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 23.8% | 68.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 3.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.18 | 1.18 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | 275× (better) |
| Current ratio | – | 0.47 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.9% | 67.1% |
| Held by insiders | 3.5% | 0.00% |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 1.3% |
Go deeper
- EQX stock overview
- EQX income statement
- EQX valuation and score
- WPM stock overview
- WPM income statement
- WPM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.