Equinox Gold vs Fortuna Mining
EQX and FSM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQX and FSM compare
Equinox Gold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (99.1% versus 39.8% for Fortuna Mining).
Fortuna Mining scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for Equinox Gold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQX | FSM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $10.31 | $9.03 |
| Change, 1 year | −21.5% | 4.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.2% | 136% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 1.06 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 99.1% (better) | 39.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.5% | 27.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 123% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −53.3% | 120% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.5% | 49.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.4% | 49.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 23.8% | 43.1% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 30.4% |
| FCF margin | 6.9% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 18.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.8% | 25.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.18 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | – |
| Current ratio | – | 2.98 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.9% | 63.9% |
| Held by insiders | 3.5% | 0.00% |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- EQX stock overview
- EQX income statement
- EQX valuation and score
- FSM stock overview
- FSM income statement
- FSM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.