EquipmentShare.com vs Sunbelt Rentals
EQPT and SUNB side by side, both in miscellaneous equipment rental and leasing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQPT and SUNB compare
Sunbelt Rentals is the larger company, worth 7.9 times as much as EquipmentShare.com ($34.3B against $4.4B).
On earnings, Sunbelt Rentals is cheaper: it trades at 26.5× trailing earnings, against 1718× for EquipmentShare.com.
EquipmentShare.com grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.3% versus 3.4% for Sunbelt Rentals).
Sunbelt Rentals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.9% compared with 0.91% at EquipmentShare.com.
Sunbelt Rentals pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; EquipmentShare.com does not pay one.
Sunbelt Rentals scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for EquipmentShare.com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQPT | SUNB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.4B | $34.3B |
| Share price | $17.18 | $83.63 |
| Change, 1 year | – | 22.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −2.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 1.28 |
| Employees | 8,206 | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 1718× | 26.5× (better) |
| P/S | 1.0× (better) | 3.1× |
| P/B | 3.6× (better) | 4.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.4× | 9.5× (better) |
| Fair value | $12.25 | $70.73 |
| Margin of safety | −40.3% | −18.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.3% (better) | 3.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1233% (better) | −14.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −11.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.3% | 38.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 6.8% | 19.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.91% | 11.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.5% | 17.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.2% | 13.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.00 | 1.15 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.82 | 1.90 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.42 (better) | 0.94 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.44 | 2.50 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | 92.5% | 35.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 4.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 42.6% | 80.3% |
| Held by insiders | 43.4% | 0.30% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$40.7M | −$478K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 8 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.5% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- EQPT stock overview
- EQPT income statement
- EQPT valuation and score
- SUNB stock overview
- SUNB income statement
- SUNB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.