Equinor ASA vs Marathon Petroleum
EQNR and MPC side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQNR and MPC compare
Marathon Petroleum grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.0% versus 2.6% for Equinor ASA).
Marathon Petroleum keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with 4.7% at Equinor ASA.
Marathon Petroleum pays a dividend yielding 0.94%; Equinor ASA does not pay one.
Marathon Petroleum scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 3 for Equinor ASA), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQNR | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $120B |
| Share price | $45.63 | $427.34 |
| Change, 1 year | 90.4% | 119% |
| Change, 5 years | 78.2% | 549% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.11 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 21K | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.7× |
| P/S | – | 0.8× |
| P/B | – | 6.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 9.3× |
| FCF yield | – | 10.7% |
| Fair value | – | $388.46 |
| Margin of safety | – | −10.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 15.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.4% (better) | 13.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −42.7% | 301% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −37.6% | 331% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 48.2% (better) | 12.5% |
| Operating margin | 23.8% (better) | 9.2% |
| Net margin | 4.7% | 5.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.6% | 8.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.2% | 47.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 19.4% | 26.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.75 (better) | 1.72 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.71 (better) | 1.44 |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.7× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.25 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.93 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.94% |
| Payout ratio | 95.0% | 13.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 21.5% (better) | 10.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.1% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 5.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.8% | 78.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.30% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$13.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- EQNR stock overview
- EQNR income statement
- EQNR valuation and score
- MPC stock overview
- MPC income statement
- MPC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.