Epsium Enterprise vs Happy City
EPSM and HCHL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EPSM and HCHL compare
Happy City grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−18.0% versus −59.1% for Epsium Enterprise).
Epsium Enterprise keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −29.3% compared with −35.7% at Happy City.
Epsium Enterprise scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 0 for Happy City), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EPSM | HCHL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.674 | $3.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −76.0% | 23.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.61 | 0.02 |
| Employees | 17 | 38 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −59.1% | −18.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −645% | −284% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 14.7% (better) | 12.6% |
| Operating margin | −29.2% (better) | −33.4% |
| Net margin | −29.3% (better) | −35.7% |
| FCF margin | −46.6% | −32.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −15.3% (better) | −173% |
| Return on invested capital | −13.5% (better) | −127% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.43 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −10.0× |
| Current ratio | 7.35 (better) | 0.83 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.1% | 2.1% |
| Held by insiders | 80.3% | 62.5% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.55% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- EPSM stock overview
- EPSM income statement
- EPSM valuation and score
- HCHL stock overview
- HCHL income statement
- HCHL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.