Essential Properties Realty Trust vs Four Corners Property Trust
EPRT and FCPT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EPRT and FCPT compare
Essential Properties Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Four Corners Property Trust ($5.8B against $2.5B).
On earnings, Four Corners Property Trust is cheaper: it trades at 20.6× trailing earnings, against 20.7× for Essential Properties Realty Trust.
Essential Properties Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.3% versus 10.2% for Four Corners Property Trust).
Essential Properties Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 43.5% compared with 37.5% at Four Corners Property Trust.
Both pay dividends: Essential Properties Realty Trust yields 4.7% and Four Corners Property Trust 4.9%.
Essential Properties Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Four Corners Property Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EPRT | FCPT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.8B | $2.5B |
| Share price | $26.75 | $22.47 |
| Change, 1 year | −11.4% | −4.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −11.3% | −24.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 0.44 |
| Employees | 56 | 496 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.7× | 20.6× (better) |
| P/S | 9.4× | 7.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.4× | – |
| PEG | 2.32 | – |
| Fair value | $29.06 | $24.60 |
| Margin of safety | 7.9% | 8.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.3% (better) | 10.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.9% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 19.6% (better) | 8.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 9.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 23.8% (better) | 0.18% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 62.8% | – |
| Net margin | 43.5% (better) | 37.5% |
| Return on equity | 6.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.2× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.37 (better) | 0.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.7% | 4.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 94.3% | 155% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.0% |
| Buyback yield | −9.5% | −5.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −4.8% | −0.84% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 117% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 0.56% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.5M | $547K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- EPRT stock overview
- EPRT income statement
- EPRT valuation and score
- FCPT stock overview
- FCPT income statement
- FCPT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.