Evolution Petroleum vs SandRidge Energy
EPM and SD side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EPM and SD compare
SandRidge Energy is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as Evolution Petroleum ($482M against $138M).
SandRidge Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.9% versus 2.8% for Evolution Petroleum).
SandRidge Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 50.1% compared with −7.1% at Evolution Petroleum.
Both pay dividends: Evolution Petroleum yields 14.0% and SandRidge Energy 5.4%.
SandRidge Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 7 for Evolution Petroleum), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EPM | SD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $138M | $482M |
| Share price | $3.44 | $12.99 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.7% | 1.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −33.8% | 10.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 0.62 |
| Employees | 11 | 102 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 5.0× |
| P/S | 1.6× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 2.1× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.8× | 3.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 10.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 9.8% |
| Fair value | $4.93 | $19.50 |
| Margin of safety | 30.2% | 33.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.8% | 24.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.4% (better) | 6.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −2792% | 47.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 47.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 6.2% | 38.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −7.1% | 50.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 24.2% |
| Return on equity | −9.3% | 18.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.6% | 16.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 1.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.86 | 1.52 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.27 | 1.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 14.0% (better) | 5.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 23.3% |
| Buyback yield | −13.5% | 0.01% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.50% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.9% | 81.7% |
| Held by insiders | 9.9% | 14.7% |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.3% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- EPM stock overview
- EPM income statement
- EPM valuation and score
- SD stock overview
- SD income statement
- SD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.