Evolution Petroleum vs Pedevco
EPM and PED side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EPM and PED compare
Pedevco is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Evolution Petroleum ($156M against $135M).
Pedevco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (336% versus 2.8% for Evolution Petroleum).
Evolution Petroleum keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.1% compared with −17.9% at Pedevco.
Evolution Petroleum pays a dividend yielding 14.3%; Pedevco does not pay one.
Pedevco scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Evolution Petroleum), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EPM | PED |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $135M | $156M |
| Share price | $3.35 | $11.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −23.7% | −3.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −35.6% | −49.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 0.44 |
| Employees | 11 | 25 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.5× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 2.1× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7× | 3.5× (better) |
| Fair value | $4.92 | $17.71 |
| Margin of safety | 31.9% | 33.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.8% | 336% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.4% | 41.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −2792% | −738% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −590% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 6.2% | 18.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −7.1% (better) | −17.9% |
| Return on equity | −9.3% (better) | −16.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.6% | 11.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.42 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.16 |
| Interest coverage | 1.4× | 3.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.86 (better) | 0.51 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.25 (better) | 0.55 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 14.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | −13.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.51% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.9% | 56.1% |
| Held by insiders | 9.9% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $1.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.3% | – |
Go deeper
- EPM stock overview
- EPM income statement
- EPM valuation and score
- PED stock overview
- PED income statement
- PED valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.