Enterprise Products Partners L.P. vs TC Energy
EPD and TRP side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EPD and TRP compare
TC Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.7% versus 6.8% for Enterprise Products Partners L.P.).
TC Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.1% compared with 10.8% at Enterprise Products Partners L.P..
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. pays a dividend yielding 5.8%; TC Energy does not pay one.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for TC Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EPD | TRP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $82.4B | – |
| Share price | $38.15 | $64.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.6% | 26.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 69.0% | 25.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | 0.38 |
| Employees | – | 6,059 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.3× | – |
| P/S | 1.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | – |
| Fair value | $36.83 | – |
| Margin of safety | −3.6% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.8% | 10.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.1% (better) | 3.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7.5% (better) | −25.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.9% (better) | −26.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.6% | 98.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.4% | 52.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.8% | 23.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.9% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 12.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 21.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.06 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.20 | 0.13 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.2× (better) | 2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.93 (better) | 0.63 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.8% | – |
| Payout ratio | – | 99.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.97% |
| Buyback yield | 0.49% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.3% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.2% | 65.7% |
| Held by insiders | 33.0% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $581K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
Go deeper
- EPD stock overview
- EPD income statement
- EPD valuation and score
- TRP stock overview
- TRP income statement
- TRP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.