Eos Energy Enterprises vs Microvast
EOSE and MVST side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EOSE and MVST compare
Eos Energy Enterprises is the larger company, worth 7.3 times as much as Microvast ($659M against $90.3M).
Eos Energy Enterprises grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (320% versus −34.7% for Microvast).
Eos Energy Enterprises scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Microvast), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EOSE | MVST |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $659M | $90.3M |
| Share price | $1.81 | $0.235 |
| Change, 1 year | −90.2% | −94.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −81.3% | −97.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.33 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 787 | 1,908 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 2.5× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.2× |
| FCF yield | −67.1% (better) | −73.2% |
| Fair value | – | $1.32 |
| Margin of safety | – | 82.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 320% (better) | −34.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 250% (better) | 31.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −72.0% | 16.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −121% | −37.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 89.2% | – |
| FCF margin | −166% | −22.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −18.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.41 |
| Interest coverage | −7.0× (better) | −21.2× |
| Current ratio | 3.31 (better) | 0.99 |
| Altman Z-score | −2.85 | −1.77 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.6% | 21.5% |
| Held by insiders | 50.4% | 46.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.4M | −$169K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 9.8% |
Go deeper
- EOSE stock overview
- EOSE income statement
- EOSE valuation and score
- MVST stock overview
- MVST income statement
- MVST valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.