StockData

Entera Bio vs VivoSim Labs

ENTX and VIVS side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ENTX and VIVS compare

Entera Bio is the larger company, worth 285 times as much as VivoSim Labs ($538M against $1.9M).

VivoSim Labs grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.6% versus −100% for Entera Bio).

Entera Bio scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for VivoSim Labs), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricENTXVIVS
Size and price
Market cap$538M$1.9M
Share price$3.11$0.127
Change, 1 year6.9%−94.4%
Change, 5 years−11.6%−99.8%
Beta (5Y)0.621.50
Employees2015
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)5
Valuation score11
Growth score00
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score6 (better)4
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–14.0×
P/B2.0×0.3× (better)
FCF yield−2.9% (better)−545%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−100%−3.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−35.1%–
EPS growth, 5Y average−17.9%–
Profitability
Operating margin–−8898%
Net margin–−7606%
FCF margin–−7619%
Return on equity−20.3% (better)−144%
Return on invested capital−193%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–−1001.0×
Current ratio128.41 (better)3.50
Altman Z-score117.35 (better)−53.22
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.00% (better)−159%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−159%
Ownership
Held by institutions6.2%0.70%
Held by insiders11.3%45.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$141K (better)$2.8K
Short interest, % of float4.6%8.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.