Enphase Energy vs Silicon Laboratories
ENPH and SLAB side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENPH and SLAB compare
Silicon Laboratories is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Enphase Energy ($7.4B against $3.4B).
Silicon Laboratories grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.3% versus −19.9% for Enphase Energy).
Enphase Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.5% compared with −2.3% at Silicon Laboratories.
Enphase Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Silicon Laboratories), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENPH | SLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4B | $7.4B |
| Share price | $26.07 | $221.43 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.1% | 74.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −90.3% | 7.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 1.36 |
| Employees | 2,872 | 1,930 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 39.5× | – |
| P/S | 2.8× (better) | 8.2× |
| P/B | 2.8× (better) | 6.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.4× | – |
| P/FCF | 25.5× (better) | 1041× |
| FCF yield | 3.9% (better) | 0.10% |
| Fair value | $35.96 | $128.32 |
| Margin of safety | 27.5% (better) | −72.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −19.9% | 21.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.7% (better) | 9.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −53.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −53.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 45.8% | 61.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.2% (better) | −2.6% |
| Net margin | 7.5% (better) | −2.3% |
| FCF margin | 11.2% (better) | 0.79% |
| Return on equity | 8.1% (better) | −1.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.3% (better) | −2.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.46 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.71 | – |
| Interest coverage | 24.0× (better) | −25.0× |
| Current ratio | 4.09 | 4.60 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.26 | 23.12 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.1% | 93.2% |
| Held by insiders | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.6M | −$4.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 21.3% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- ENPH stock overview
- ENPH income statement
- ENPH valuation and score
- SLAB stock overview
- SLAB income statement
- SLAB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.