StockData

Enovis vs Smith & Nephew

ENOV and SNN side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ENOV and SNN compare

Smith & Nephew grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.1% versus 3.3% for Enovis).

Enovis scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Smith & Nephew), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricENOVSNN
Size and price
Market cap$1.6B–
Share price$27.68$31.28
Change, 1 year−11.4%−6.5%
Change, 5 years−81.7%−9.7%
Beta (5Y)1.140.62
Employees7,80218K
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)6
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score11
Health score24 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.7×–
P/B1.1×–
EV/EBITDA3.3×–
P/FCF22.9×–
FCF yield4.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.3%6.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.9% (better)6.2%
EPS growth (TTM)–52.3%
EPS growth, 5Y average–6.9%
Profitability
Gross margin61.3%68.0% (better)
Operating margin−20.6%12.9% (better)
Net margin−22.9%–
FCF margin3.0%–
Return on equity−30.0%–
Return on invested capital−12.3%13.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.840.10 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA1.43 (better)−0.31
Interest coverage−14.7×5.7× (better)
Current ratio2.15 (better)2.14
Altman Z-score0.29–
Piotroski F-score4–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions122%4.2%
Held by insiders2.7%25.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months$792K–
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float18.8%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.