Enel Chile vs Korea Electric Power
ENIC and KEP side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENIC and KEP compare
Korea Electric Power scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 0 for Enel Chile), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENIC | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $4.13 | $10.34 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.7% | −35.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 89.4% | 4.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 0.73 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 0 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 4.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 10.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 145% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 145% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 33.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 16.4% |
| Operating margin | – | 14.5% |
| Net margin | – | 8.8% |
| FCF margin | – | 5.2% |
| Return on equity | – | 19.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.46 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.71 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.8× |
| Current ratio | – | 0.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.09% | 5.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Go deeper
- ENIC stock overview
- ENIC income statement
- ENIC valuation and score
- KEP stock overview
- KEP income statement
- KEP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.