Energys vs WF International
ENGS and WXM side by side, both in construction special trade contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENGS and WXM compare
WF International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−13.7% versus −28.2% for Energys).
WF International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −24.5% compared with −30.1% at Energys.
Energys scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for WF International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENGS | WXM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.364 | $2.68 |
| Change, 1 year | −72.6% | −54.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.34 | 2.02 |
| Employees | 38 | 28 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −28.2% | −13.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −442% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −394% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.4% (better) | 8.8% |
| Operating margin | −25.2% | −21.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −30.1% | −24.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −7.4% | – |
| Return on equity | – | −66.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −93.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.11 (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 75.8% | – |
Go deeper
- ENGS stock overview
- ENGS income statement
- ENGS valuation and score
- WXM stock overview
- WXM income statement
- WXM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.