Energys vs Magnitude International
ENGS and MAGH side by side, both in construction special trade contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENGS and MAGH compare
Magnitude International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.0% versus −28.2% for Energys).
Magnitude International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −12.2% compared with −30.1% at Energys.
Energys scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for Magnitude International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENGS | MAGH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.485 | $6.76 |
| Change, 1 year | −57.1% | 393% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | −0.50 |
| Employees | 38 | 107 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −28.2% | 24.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −5528% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −7100% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.4% (better) | 10.5% |
| Operating margin | −25.2% | −11.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −30.1% | −12.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −7.4% (better) | −10.2% |
| Return on equity | – | −83.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −43.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.41 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −15.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.84 | 1.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 75.8% | 0.00% |
Go deeper
- ENGS stock overview
- ENGS income statement
- ENGS valuation and score
- MAGH stock overview
- MAGH income statement
- MAGH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.