Emera vs Fortis
EMA and FTS side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EMA and FTS compare
Emera grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.9% versus 5.8% for Fortis).
Emera scores higher on the StockData Score (2 against 1 for Fortis), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EMA | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $49.29 | $58.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.0% | 16.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 4.7% | 30.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | 0.26 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.9% (better) | 5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.8% (better) | 6.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 97.7% (better) | 4.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −2.2% | 5.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 72.3% |
| Operating margin | 22.5% | 28.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −19.7% | −15.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.5% (better) | 4.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.60 | 1.42 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.45 | 6.42 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.9× | 2.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.66 (better) | 0.56 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Years of dividend growth | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.3% | 5.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.8% | 52.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $45.1K |
Go deeper
- EMA stock overview
- EMA income statement
- EMA valuation and score
- FTS stock overview
- FTS income statement
- FTS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.