Elevra Lithium vs Smart Sand
ELVR and SND side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ELVR and SND compare
Smart Sand grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.2% versus 11.2% for Elevra Lithium).
Smart Sand keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.9% compared with −132% at Elevra Lithium.
Smart Sand pays a dividend yielding 5.6%; Elevra Lithium does not pay one.
Smart Sand scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 3 for Elevra Lithium), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ELVR | SND |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $190M |
| Share price | $27.85 | $4.49 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.3% | 102% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 130% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.10 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 246 | 318 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.8× |
| P/S | – | 0.5× |
| P/B | – | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 5.1× |
| FCF yield | – | 19.5% |
| Fair value | – | $6.51 |
| Margin of safety | – | 31.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.2% | 21.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 22.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 306% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 322% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −49.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 13.9% |
| Operating margin | −172% | 2.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −132% | 3.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −15.4% | 9.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −54.2% | 6.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −58.9% | 4.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.18 | 0.05 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.31 |
| Interest coverage | −78.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.38 | 1.81 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.74 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 64.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.90% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 6.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.02% | 46.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.01% | 34.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$267K (better) | −$2.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- ELVR stock overview
- ELVR income statement
- ELVR valuation and score
- SND stock overview
- SND income statement
- SND valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.