Energy Co of Parana vs ReNew Energy Global
ELPC and RNW side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ELPC and RNW compare
ReNew Energy Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.2% versus 15.3% for Energy Co of Parana).
ReNew Energy Global scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Energy Co of Parana), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ELPC | RNW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $10.91 | $6.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.9% | −5.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −21.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 4,276 | 4,720 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.3% | 36.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | 19.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 158% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 152% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.7% | – |
| Operating margin | −2.4% | 10.6% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 7.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 8.3% |
| Return on invested capital | −2.4% | 1.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 6.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 18.29 |
| Interest coverage | −0.2× | 0.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.98 (better) | 0.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.70% | 40.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.02% | 82.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$760K | – |
Go deeper
- ELPC stock overview
- ELPC income statement
- ELPC valuation and score
- RNW stock overview
- RNW income statement
- RNW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.