e.l.f. Beauty vs Edgewell Personal Care
ELF and EPC side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ELF and EPC compare
e.l.f. Beauty is the larger company, worth 5.0 times as much as Edgewell Personal Care ($6.6B against $1.3B).
e.l.f. Beauty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.2% versus 11.6% for Edgewell Personal Care).
e.l.f. Beauty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.4% compared with −4.2% at Edgewell Personal Care.
Edgewell Personal Care pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; e.l.f. Beauty does not pay one.
e.l.f. Beauty scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Edgewell Personal Care), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ELF | EPC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.6B | $1.3B |
| Share price | $111.69 | $28.57 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.0% | 50.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 256% | −25.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.45 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 849 | 6,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 112× | – |
| P/S | 3.7× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 5.6× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 32.2× | 21.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.5× (better) | 25.1× |
| FCF yield | 4.3% (better) | 4.0% |
| Fair value | $71.15 | – |
| Margin of safety | −57.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 31.2% (better) | 11.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 38.8% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −39.1% (better) | −244% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −41.2% (better) | −247% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.7% (better) | −15.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 74.4% (better) | 39.5% |
| Operating margin | 7.2% (better) | 0.80% |
| Net margin | 3.4% (better) | −4.2% |
| FCF margin | 15.9% (better) | 2.3% |
| Return on equity | 6.0% (better) | −6.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 7.1% (better) | 0.56% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.71 (better) | 0.85 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.22 (better) | 8.47 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.3× |
| Current ratio | 2.55 (better) | 1.84 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.15 (better) | 1.60 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.1% |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% (better) | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.8% | 117% |
| Held by insiders | 4.9% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$28.2M | −$5.7K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.3% | 10.4% |
Go deeper
- ELF stock overview
- ELF income statement
- ELF valuation and score
- EPC stock overview
- EPC income statement
- EPC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.