Envela vs Tokyo Lifestyle
ELA and TKLF side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ELA and TKLF compare
Tokyo Lifestyle grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (77.6% versus 47.7% for Envela).
Envela keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with 0.19% at Tokyo Lifestyle.
Envela scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 6 for Tokyo Lifestyle), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ELA | TKLF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $274M | – |
| Share price | $10.55 | $1.53 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.1% | −49.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 150% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.34 |
| Employees | 288 | 68 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.3× | – |
| P/S | 0.9× | – |
| P/B | 3.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 11.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.8% | – |
| Fair value | $14.89 | – |
| Margin of safety | 29.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 47.7% | 77.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.2% (better) | 10.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 162% (better) | −89.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 161% (better) | −87.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.5% (better) | −35.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.7% | – |
| Operating margin | 9.6% (better) | 0.86% |
| Net margin | 7.6% (better) | 0.19% |
| FCF margin | 8.2% (better) | −2.8% |
| Return on equity | 32.4% (better) | 1.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 46.5% (better) | 1.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.12 (better) | 1.55 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.13 | 14.07 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 79.8× (better) | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 4.24 (better) | 1.30 |
| Altman Z-score | 10.69 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 74.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 19.3% | 0.00% |
| Held by insiders | 0.01% | 91.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.8K | $456K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | – |
Go deeper
- ELA stock overview
- ELA income statement
- ELA valuation and score
- TKLF stock overview
- TKLF income statement
- TKLF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.