Envela vs GrabAGun Digital
ELA and PEW side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ELA and PEW compare
Envela is the larger company, worth 6.3 times as much as GrabAGun Digital ($271M against $43.1M).
Envela grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (47.7% versus 7.8% for GrabAGun Digital).
Envela keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with −6.3% at GrabAGun Digital.
Envela scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 8 for GrabAGun Digital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ELA | PEW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $271M | $43.1M |
| Share price | $10.42 | $1.46 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.6% | −66.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 147% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.31 |
| Employees | 288 | 50 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× | – |
| P/S | 0.9× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 3.4× | 0.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 11.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.9% (better) | −42.5% |
| Fair value | $14.77 | $1.39 |
| Margin of safety | 29.4% (better) | −5.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 47.7% (better) | 7.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.2% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 162% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 161% (better) | −217% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.7% (better) | 13.7% |
| Operating margin | 9.6% (better) | −9.4% |
| Net margin | 7.6% (better) | −6.3% |
| FCF margin | 8.2% (better) | −18.3% |
| Return on equity | 32.4% (better) | −6.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 46.5% (better) | −1329% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.12 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.13 | – |
| Interest coverage | 79.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.24 | 6.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 10.62 (better) | 2.44 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 5.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 19.3% | 19.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.01% | 19.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.8K (better) | −$150K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | 9.0% |
Go deeper
- ELA stock overview
- ELA income statement
- ELA valuation and score
- PEW stock overview
- PEW income statement
- PEW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.