StockData

eHealth vs TWFG

EHTH and TWFG side by side, both in insurance agents, brokers, and service. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How EHTH and TWFG compare

TWFG is the larger company, worth 102 times as much as eHealth ($1.4B against $14.1M).

TWFG grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.0% versus −13.6% for eHealth).

eHealth scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for TWFG), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEHTHTWFG
Size and price
Market cap$14.1M$1.4B
Share price$0.440$26.72
Change, 1 year−89.4%2.7%
Change, 5 years−98.2%–
Beta (5Y)1.600.24
Employees1,665400
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)7
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score24 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–46.1×
P/S0.0× (better)4.7×
P/B0.0× (better)30.5×
EV/EBITDA0.8× (better)19.8×
P/FCF–26.2×
FCF yield−122%3.8% (better)
Fair value–$10.83
Margin of safety–−147%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−13.6%35.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−1.0%–
Net income growth (TTM)−54.4%–
EPS growth (TTM)−955%34.9% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin44.7%–
Operating margin10.6%17.3% (better)
Net margin4.9%–
FCF margin−3.7%17.8% (better)
Return on equity4.6%–
Return on invested capital6.2%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.230.05 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA0.55 (better)−0.94
Interest coverage3.2×207× (better)
Current ratio8.68 (better)2.81
Altman Z-score0.8514.79 (better)
Piotroski F-score4–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions56.9%16.9%
Held by insiders11.7%69.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months$188K$3.4M (better)
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float2.8%6.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.