StockData

EHang vs Karman

EH and KRMN side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How EH and KRMN compare

Karman grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (56.3% versus −8.4% for EHang).

Karman keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.5% compared with −66.0% at EHang.

Karman scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for EHang), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEHKRMN
Size and price
Market cap–$5.4B
Share price$3.73$40.50
Change, 1 year−77.0%−41.6%
Change, 5 years−83.8%–
Beta (5Y)1.871.44
Employees8291,400
StockData Score
Total score610 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score24 (better)
Performance score14 (better)
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–104×
P/S–8.0×
P/B–12.2×
EV/EBITDA–36.2×
FCF yield–−0.14%
Fair value–$12.06
Margin of safety–−236%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−8.4%56.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average18.3%–
Net income growth (TTM)–345%
EPS growth (TTM)–388%
Profitability
Gross margin61.5% (better)42.1%
Operating margin−75.8%16.3% (better)
Net margin−66.0%7.5% (better)
FCF margin−78.3%−1.1% (better)
Return on equity−27.3%12.4% (better)
Return on invested capital–10.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.08 (better)1.94
Net debt / EBITDA–4.65
Interest coverage−53.0×1.9× (better)
Current ratio2.073.10 (better)
Altman Z-score–3.57
Piotroski F-score36 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions6.0%93.8%
Held by insiders2.7%62.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$9.2M
Short interest, % of float–38.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.