Egain vs NetSol Technologies
EGAN and NTWK side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EGAN and NTWK compare
Egain is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as NetSol Technologies ($162M against $60.0M).
On earnings, NetSol Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 10.9× trailing earnings, against 22.1× for Egain.
NetSol Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.6% versus −0.71% for Egain).
Egain keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.5% compared with 7.0% at NetSol Technologies.
NetSol Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 17 for Egain), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EGAN | NTWK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $162M | $60.0M |
| Share price | $6.20 | $5.02 |
| Change, 1 year | −58.9% | 69.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −42.5% | 6.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.64 |
| Employees | 422 | 1,370 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 6 | 6 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.1× | 10.9× (better) |
| P/S | 1.8× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 2.0× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.3× | 4.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 13.4× (better) | 114× |
| PEG | 0.30 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.4% (better) | 0.88% |
| Fair value | $7.90 | $11.16 |
| Margin of safety | 21.5% | 55.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.71% | 6.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −77.9% | 1005% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −77.2% | 1433% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.8% | 10.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 72.7% (better) | 52.9% |
| Operating margin | 7.6% | 11.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.5% (better) | 7.0% |
| FCF margin | 13.5% (better) | 0.67% |
| Return on equity | 9.1% | 14.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 45.5% (better) | 43.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −1.86 |
| Current ratio | 1.83 | 2.27 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.09 | 2.77 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 8.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.4% | 17.1% |
| Held by insiders | 72.3% | 20.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$366K | −$51.4K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.0% | 1.3% |
Go deeper
- EGAN stock overview
- EGAN income statement
- EGAN valuation and score
- NTWK stock overview
- NTWK income statement
- NTWK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.