StockData

Enerflex vs Zebra Technologies

EFXT and ZBRA side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How EFXT and ZBRA compare

Zebra Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.7% versus 6.5% for Enerflex).

Zebra Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for Enerflex), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEFXTZBRA
Size and price
Market cap–$17.1B
Share price$23.63$361.26
Change, 1 year85.9%33.4%
Change, 5 years236%−40.5%
Beta (5Y)0.791.63
Employees–11K
StockData Score
Total score310 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score04 (better)
Health score22
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–33.1×
P/S–2.9×
P/B–5.0×
EV/EBITDA–18.4×
P/FCF–18.9×
FCF yield–5.3%
Fair value–$344.42
Margin of safety–−4.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)6.5%12.7% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–3.9%
Net income growth (TTM)–−1.6%
EPS growth (TTM)100% (better)3.1%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−2.6%
Profitability
Gross margin22.6%49.6% (better)
Operating margin11.9%14.7% (better)
Net margin–9.2%
FCF margin12.7%15.5% (better)
Return on equity–15.3%
Return on invested capital9.4%11.9% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.53 (better)0.81
Net debt / EBITDA1.07 (better)2.44
Interest coverage2.5×–
Current ratio1.13 (better)0.52
Altman Z-score–3.62
Piotroski F-score–4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–5.3%
Shareholder yield–5.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions67.1%104%
Held by insiders0.00%1.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$2.0M
Short interest, % of float1.2%3.5%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.