Everforth vs Kelly Services
EFOR and KELYA side by side, both in personnel supply services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EFOR and KELYA compare
Everforth is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as Kelly Services ($1.5B against $476M).
Everforth grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.04% versus −7.7% for Kelly Services).
Everforth keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.7% compared with −3.1% at Kelly Services.
Kelly Services pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Everforth does not pay one.
Everforth scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Kelly Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EFOR | KELYA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $476M |
| Share price | $35.55 | $13.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −21.8% | 59.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.7% | −21.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 0.87 |
| Employees | 3,320 | 3,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.8× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× | 0.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× (better) | 8.3× |
| P/FCF | 7.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 13.4% (better) | −1.7% |
| Fair value | $59.07 | $19.79 |
| Margin of safety | 39.8% (better) | 30.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.04% (better) | −7.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.6% (better) | −1.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −48.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −44.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −7.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.3% (better) | 19.7% |
| Operating margin | 4.6% (better) | 0.27% |
| Net margin | 1.7% (better) | −3.1% |
| FCF margin | 4.9% (better) | −0.20% |
| Return on equity | 3.7% (better) | −11.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% (better) | 0.53% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.4× (better) | 1.3× |
| Current ratio | 2.13 (better) | 1.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.08 | 2.78 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.2% |
| Buyback yield | 7.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.9% (better) | 2.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 75.5% |
| Held by insiders | 3.1% | 23.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.9M (better) | −$106M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.5% | – |
Go deeper
- EFOR stock overview
- EFOR income statement
- EFOR valuation and score
- KELYA stock overview
- KELYA income statement
- KELYA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.