Ellington Financial vs Millrose Properties
EFC and MRP side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EFC and MRP compare
Millrose Properties is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Ellington Financial ($4.3B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Ellington Financial is cheaper: it trades at 7.0× trailing earnings, against 8.9× for Millrose Properties.
Millrose Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 62.6% compared with 42.6% at Ellington Financial.
Both pay dividends: Ellington Financial yields 13.7% and Millrose Properties 12.0%.
Ellington Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 10 for Millrose Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EFC | MRP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $4.3B |
| Share price | $11.41 | $25.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.3% | −20.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −38.1% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 500 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.0× (better) | 8.9× |
| P/S | 3.2× (better) | 5.6× |
| P/B | 0.7× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.5× |
| Fair value | $19.84 | $42.16 |
| Margin of safety | 42.5% (better) | 39.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 44.8% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 48.5% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 71.5% | 1961% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 32.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 85.1% |
| Net margin | 42.6% | 62.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.7% (better) | 8.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 4.1× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.04 | 0.96 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 13.7% (better) | 12.0% |
| Payout ratio | 106% | 102% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 315% | – |
| Buyback yield | −27.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −13.5% | 12.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 49.9% | 85.5% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 14.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $6.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.1% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- EFC stock overview
- EFC income statement
- EFC valuation and score
- MRP stock overview
- MRP income statement
- MRP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.