Educational Development vs Natural Health Trends
EDUC and NHTC side by side, both in wholesale trade-non-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EDUC and NHTC compare
Educational Development and Natural Health Trends are about the same size, with market caps of $7.7M and $6.8M.
Natural Health Trends grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−16.5% versus −32.0% for Educational Development).
Educational Development keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.6% compared with −4.2% at Natural Health Trends.
Natural Health Trends pays a dividend yielding 49.9%; Educational Development does not pay one.
Natural Health Trends scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Educational Development), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EDUC | NHTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.7M | $6.8M |
| Share price | $0.908 | $0.802 |
| Change, 1 year | −32.7% | −76.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −90.8% | −88.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| Employees | – | 120 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 4.8× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 0.2× (better) | 0.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 43.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 2.3% (better) | −68.5% |
| Fair value | $5.23 | $2.98 |
| Margin of safety | 82.6% (better) | 73.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −32.0% | −16.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −35.5% | −8.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −29.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.1% | 74.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | −5.9% |
| Net margin | 8.6% (better) | −4.2% |
| FCF margin | 0.88% (better) | −13.7% |
| Return on equity | 4.4% (better) | −6.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 3.27 (better) | 2.13 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.13 (better) | −0.15 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 49.9% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 49.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 21.4% | 12.2% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 13.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.27% | 0.61% |
Go deeper
- EDUC stock overview
- EDUC income statement
- EDUC valuation and score
- NHTC stock overview
- NHTC income statement
- NHTC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.