New Oriental Education & Technology vs Graham
EDU and GHC side by side, both in services-educational services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EDU and GHC compare
New Oriental Education & Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.5% versus 4.3% for Graham).
Graham keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.7% compared with 8.4% at New Oriental Education & Technology.
Graham pays a dividend yielding 0.62%; New Oriental Education & Technology does not pay one.
Graham scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 13 for New Oriental Education & Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EDU | GHC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $5.1B |
| Share price | $52.76 | $1216.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.4% | 10.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 141% | 104% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.37 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 81K | 20K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 10.7× |
| P/S | – | 1.0× |
| P/B | – | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 21.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 23.0× |
| PEG | – | 0.16 |
| FCF yield | – | 4.4% |
| Fair value | – | $1335.40 |
| Margin of safety | – | 8.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.5% (better) | 4.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% | 11.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.8% (better) | −32.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −31.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 2.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 54.6% | – |
| Operating margin | 11.4% (better) | 5.4% |
| Net margin | 8.4% | 9.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 13.8% (better) | 4.3% |
| Return on equity | 12.4% (better) | 10.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 22.3% (better) | 4.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.18 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.55 |
| Interest coverage | 22973× (better) | 5.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.50 | 1.76 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.22 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.62% |
| Payout ratio | 20.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 4.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.1% | 65.4% |
| Held by insiders | 11.1% | 29.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.1M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 8.0% |
Go deeper
- EDU stock overview
- EDU income statement
- EDU valuation and score
- GHC stock overview
- GHC income statement
- GHC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.