StockData

Everbright Digital vs Forcendra

EDHL and FCDH side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How EDHL and FCDH compare

Forcendra grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.8% versus −32.6% for Everbright Digital).

Forcendra keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −114% compared with −121% at Everbright Digital.

Everbright Digital scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Forcendra), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEDHLFCDH
Size and price
Share price$5.88$0.602
Change, 1 year−59.5%−95.7%
Beta (5Y)0.222.55
Employees642
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−32.6%−8.8% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−692%–
EPS growth (TTM)−160%–
Profitability
Gross margin65.4% (better)23.7%
Operating margin–−85.4%
Net margin−121%−114% (better)
FCF margin–−46.9%
Return on equity−70.8% (better)−318%
Return on invested capital–−277%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−39.4×
Current ratio3.69 (better)1.47
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Years of dividend growth–0
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.05%
Held by insiders0.00%0.00%
Short interest, % of float4.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.